PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
46.67%
Positive revenue growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
48.07%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 1.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1383.88%
Positive EBIT growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1383.88%
Positive operating income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
202.37%
Positive net income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
211.76%
Positive EPS growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
211.76%
Positive diluted EPS growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-8.33%
Share reduction while E4C.DE is at 2.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-8.33%
Reduced diluted shares while E4C.DE is at 2.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while E4C.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.44%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 33.72%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
64.44%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 57.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
64.44%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 36.37%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133.07%
Below 50% of E4C.DE's 1621.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
133.07%
Positive 5Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
133.07%
Positive short-term CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
17.85%
Equity/share CAGR of 17.85% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
17.85%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 7.27%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.85%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 15.95%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.18%
AR growth well above E4C.DE's 6.76%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.26%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. E4C.DE's 84.20%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
3.63%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 2.57%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
18.30%
Positive BV/share change while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.61%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.56%
SG&A growth of 22.56% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.