PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.49%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-10.59%
Negative gross profit growth while E4C.DE is at 1.11%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
23.47%
Positive EBIT growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
23.47%
Positive operating income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
82.80%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 59.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
69.29%
EPS growth similar to E4C.DE's 68.50%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
69.29%
Similar diluted EPS growth to E4C.DE's 68.50%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
9.26%
Slight or no buybacks while E4C.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
10.00%
Slight or no buyback while E4C.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.96%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
7.04%
Inventory growth of 7.04% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.26%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
7.85%
Similar to E4C.DE's 7.74%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-13.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.17%
We cut SG&A while E4C.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.