PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.02%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 15.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
15.57%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 2.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
251.12%
Positive EBIT growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
251.12%
Operating income growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 6.49%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
24.37%
Net income growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 5.01%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
20.00%
EPS growth of 20.00% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 20.00% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
7.82%
Share count expansion well above E4C.DE's 11.61%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
7.82%
Diluted share count expanding well above E4C.DE's 11.61%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while E4C.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-52.88%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-74.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
64.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 3.29%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
64.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 5.34%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
29.67%
Positive 3Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
226.96%
Below 50% of E4C.DE's 2033.40%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
226.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
100.21%
Positive short-term CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
109.56%
Equity/share CAGR of 109.56% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
109.56%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 13.79%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
77.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 0.33%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.31%
AR growth well above E4C.DE's 48.97%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
9.16%
We show growth while E4C.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.04%
Asset growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 3.43%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.22%
Positive BV/share change while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-12.02%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.69%
SG&A growth of 10.69% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.