3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.63%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-3.06%
Negative gross profit growth while E4C.DE is at 6.91%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-45.06%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-58.66%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-49.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-52.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-52.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
3.75%
Slight or no buybacks while E4C.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.75%
Slight or no buyback while E4C.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.13%
OCF growth at 50-75% of E4C.DE's 104.19%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
178.77%
Positive FCF growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.99%
Positive 3Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.01%
Positive short-term CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.12%
Positive short-term equity growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.97%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while E4C.DE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-11.07%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.77%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.36%
Positive asset growth while E4C.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
9.63%
1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 7.64%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-1.92%
We’re deleveraging while E4C.DE stands at 36.51%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.06%
SG&A growth of 42.06% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.