PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.96%
Revenue growth under 50% of E4C.DE's 16.67%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
14.44%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 2.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
141.21%
Positive EBIT growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
133.19%
Positive operating income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
116.53%
Positive net income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
116.41%
Positive EPS growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
116.41%
Positive diluted EPS growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.50%
Dividend growth of 9.50% while E4C.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-23.68%
Negative OCF growth while E4C.DE is at 822.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-22.64%
Negative FCF growth while E4C.DE is at 64.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
67.14%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
31.65%
Positive 5Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
1.98%
Positive 3Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while E4C.DE stands at 214.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
56.28%
Positive 10Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-4.30%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-66.67%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
142.29%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 3.60%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
105.17%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
71.57%
Positive short-term equity growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while E4C.DE shows 20.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
5.28%
We show growth while E4C.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.81%
Positive asset growth while E4C.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.05%
Positive BV/share change while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.24%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.19%
We cut SG&A while E4C.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.