PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.70%
Negative revenue growth while E4C.DE stands at 10.09%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-25.63%
Negative gross profit growth while E4C.DE is at 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-22.73%
Negative EBIT growth while E4C.DE is at 96.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-35.96%
Negative operating income growth while E4C.DE is at 84.80%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-51.77%
Negative net income growth while E4C.DE stands at 348.05%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-51.81%
Negative EPS growth while E4C.DE is at 340.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-51.81%
Negative diluted EPS growth while E4C.DE is at 340.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
600.75%
Dividend growth of 600.75% while E4C.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
16.25%
OCF growth under 50% of E4C.DE's 55.81%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
31.42%
Positive FCF growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-0.75%
Negative 3Y CAGR while E4C.DE stands at 11.10%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.84%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while E4C.DE stands at 466.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
136.12%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 123.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
-73.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while E4C.DE is 598.26%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
135.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 0.73%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
13.16%
Positive short-term equity growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.12%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while E4C.DE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
30.40%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while E4C.DE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.87%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.26%
Negative asset growth while E4C.DE invests at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.75%
We have a declining book value while E4C.DE shows 5.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
12.92%
We have some new debt while E4C.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.48%
We cut SG&A while E4C.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.