PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
22.54%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 16.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
18.42%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 3.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
3.61%
EBIT growth below 50% of E4C.DE's 2377.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
11.38%
Operating income growth under 50% of E4C.DE's 528.30%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
15.82%
Net income growth under 50% of E4C.DE's 518.92%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
16.67%
EPS growth under 50% of E4C.DE's 515.52%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
16.67%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of E4C.DE's 515.52%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1640.45%
Dividend growth of 1640.45% while E4C.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-60.91%
Negative OCF growth while E4C.DE is at 512.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-62.05%
Negative FCF growth while E4C.DE is at 428.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
209.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 42.14%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
88.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
86.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 47.86%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.10%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while E4C.DE is at 1466.98%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
83.73%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of E4C.DE's 637.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
878.42%
Below 50% of E4C.DE's 3513.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
108.66%
Below 50% of E4C.DE's 13572.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
413.81%
Below 50% of E4C.DE's 39895.64%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
242.42%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 90.45%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
142.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 90.92%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
50.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of E4C.DE's 95.75%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.99%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 55.99% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
40.31%
AR growth well above E4C.DE's 18.09%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
27.84%
Inventory growth of 27.84% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
15.32%
Asset growth at 50-75% of E4C.DE's 22.73%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
13.67%
Under 50% of E4C.DE's 29.25%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
15.98%
We have some new debt while E4C.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.03%
SG&A growth well above E4C.DE's 11.83%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.