PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-30.35%
Negative gross profit growth while E4C.DE is at 4.10%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-41.07%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-45.04%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-49.05%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-48.57%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-48.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.77%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
244.19%
Positive OCF growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
302.43%
Positive FCF growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
67.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 12.37%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.99%
Below 50% of E4C.DE's 214.92%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
112.69%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
590.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.46%
Below 50% of E4C.DE's 307.04%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
56.13%
Below 50% of E4C.DE's 337.85%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.62%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-33.06%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-36.31%
Firm’s AR is declining while E4C.DE shows 10.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-7.43%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-8.07%
Negative asset growth while E4C.DE invests at 64.18%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
6.90%
Under 50% of E4C.DE's 134.01%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-18.11%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.58%
We cut SG&A while E4C.DE invests at 11.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.