PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.34%
Positive revenue growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
19.13%
Positive gross profit growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
18.97%
Positive EBIT growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-43.64%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-76.36%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-76.78%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-76.78%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1956.17%
Dividend growth of 1956.17% while E4C.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-44.76%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-48.25%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
169.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 7.19%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
63.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 1.76%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
61.37%
Positive 3Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133.81%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to E4C.DE's 136.90%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
53.96%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
17.86%
Below 50% of E4C.DE's 456.82%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-63.95%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while E4C.DE is 1544.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-24.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while E4C.DE is 6899.69%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
255.52%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 32.69%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
69.65%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 16.61%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
46.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 21.97%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1156.98%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1156.98% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
44.20%
Our AR growth while E4C.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-10.77%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
5.95%
Positive asset growth while E4C.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.92%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
18.40%
Debt growth far above E4C.DE's 13.57%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.53%
We expand SG&A while E4C.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.