PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.43%
Negative revenue growth while E4C.DE stands at 5.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.94%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-22.88%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
80.36%
Positive operating income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
279.01%
Positive net income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
282.78%
Positive EPS growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
282.78%
Positive diluted EPS growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.25%
Dividend reduction while E4C.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
69.79%
Positive OCF growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
64.06%
Positive FCF growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 24.95%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
45.59%
Positive 3Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.44%
Positive OCF/share growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
124.88%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.96%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of E4C.DE's 289.77%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
492.66%
Positive short-term CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 22.28%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
60.86%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 19.64%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.62%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while E4C.DE stands at 14386.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-87.88%
Negative near-term dividend growth while E4C.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-23.72%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-16.60%
Inventory is declining while E4C.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-4.17%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
5.34%
BV/share growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 1.48%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.87%
We’re deleveraging while E4C.DE stands at 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.21%
We cut SG&A while E4C.DE invests at 2.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.