3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.10%
Revenue growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 1.83%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
236.90%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 149.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
35.92%
EBIT growth below 50% of E4C.DE's 71.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
36.38%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 30.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
36.31%
Net income growth at 50-75% of E4C.DE's 59.23%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
37.50%
EPS growth at 50-75% of E4C.DE's 57.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
37.50%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of E4C.DE's 57.14%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1350.22%
Dividend growth of 1350.22% while E4C.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-24.06%
Negative OCF growth while E4C.DE is at 17.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-17.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 33.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
16.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of E4C.DE's 35.12%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
350.46%
Positive OCF/share growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
195.32%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.77%
Below 50% of E4C.DE's 1452.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
9.39%
Positive short-term CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 25.67%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
55.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x E4C.DE's 12.68%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.30%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.30% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
61.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 61.06% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
32.36%
AR growth well above E4C.DE's 19.60%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.31%
Inventory growth of 0.31% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
9.79%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 6.57%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
5.38%
BV/share growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 1.90%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
10.11%
Debt growth far above E4C.DE's 13.75%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
218.77%
We expand SG&A while E4C.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.