PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.38%
Negative revenue growth while IXX.DE stands at 30.75%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.68%
Negative gross profit growth while IXX.DE is at 46.20%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-128.13%
Negative EBIT growth while IXX.DE is at 34.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-128.13%
Negative operating income growth while IXX.DE is at 121.64%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-38.33%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-41.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-41.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.03%
Slight or no buybacks while IXX.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.03%
Slight or no buyback while IXX.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.89%
OCF growth under 50% of IXX.DE's 539.25%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
49.45%
FCF growth under 50% of IXX.DE's 380.49%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.14%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.33%
We show growth while IXX.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
17.09%
Positive asset growth while IXX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
44.33%
Positive BV/share change while IXX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
7.51%
We have some new debt while IXX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
We cut SG&A while IXX.DE invests at 15.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.