3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.63%
Negative revenue growth while IXX.DE stands at 10.61%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.06%
Negative gross profit growth while IXX.DE is at 11.79%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-45.06%
Negative EBIT growth while IXX.DE is at 19.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-58.66%
Negative operating income growth while IXX.DE is at 148.92%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-49.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-52.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-52.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
3.75%
Share count expansion well above IXX.DE's 0.13%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.75%
Diluted share count expanding well above IXX.DE's 0.14%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.13%
OCF growth under 50% of IXX.DE's 709.49%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
178.77%
FCF growth under 50% of IXX.DE's 507.50%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.99%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x IXX.DE's 24.74%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.01%
Positive short-term CAGR while IXX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x IXX.DE's 6.07%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.97%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 15.97% while IXX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-11.07%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.77%
Inventory is declining while IXX.DE stands at 0.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.36%
Positive asset growth while IXX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
9.63%
BV/share growth above 1.5x IXX.DE's 1.23%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.92%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.06%
We expand SG&A while IXX.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.