PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.01%
Positive revenue growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
28.02%
Positive gross profit growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
569.92%
EBIT growth of 569.92% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
569.92%
Positive operating income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
166.51%
Positive net income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSX.DE stands at 486.29%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while LSX.DE stands at 505.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSX.DE stands at 247.97%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSX.DE is 108.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-100.00%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while LSX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while LSX.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while LSX.DE is at 167.50%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.19%
AR growth well above LSX.DE's 0.51%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.17%
We show growth while LSX.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.20%
Asset growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 0.25%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.24%
We’re deleveraging while LSX.DE stands at 5.30%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.76%
We expand SG&A while LSX.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.