3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.43%
Positive revenue growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.32%
Positive gross profit growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
229.06%
EBIT growth of 229.06% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
229.06%
Positive operating income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
133.80%
Positive net income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSX.DE's 455.81%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
26.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSX.DE's 320.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
26.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSX.DE's 118.25%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.31%
Below 50% of LSX.DE's 531.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
63.31%
Below 50% of LSX.DE's 193.86%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
63.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
18.10%
Equity/share CAGR of 18.10% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
18.10%
Equity/share CAGR of 18.10% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
18.10%
Below 50% of LSX.DE's 163.88%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.59%
Our AR growth while LSX.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.91%
Inventory growth of 3.91% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
0.82%
Asset growth well under 50% of LSX.DE's 7.77%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.86%
We’re deleveraging while LSX.DE stands at 24.08%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.97%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.