PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
46.67%
Positive revenue growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
48.07%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 2.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1383.88%
EBIT growth of 1383.88% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
1383.88%
Positive operating income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
202.37%
Positive net income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
211.76%
Positive EPS growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
211.76%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-8.33%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-8.33%
Reduced diluted shares while LSX.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while LSX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.44%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSX.DE's 409.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
64.44%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSX.DE's 202.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
64.44%
Positive 3Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133.07%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
133.07%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
133.07%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
17.85%
Equity/share CAGR of 17.85% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
17.85%
Below 50% of LSX.DE's 179.10%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
17.85%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 7.30%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.18%
Our AR growth while LSX.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.26%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSX.DE's 79.10%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
3.63%
Positive asset growth while LSX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
18.30%
Positive BV/share change while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.61%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.56%
SG&A growth well above LSX.DE's 5.99%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.