PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.49%
Negative revenue growth while LSX.DE stands at 20.09%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.59%
Negative gross profit growth while LSX.DE is at 10.47%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
23.47%
EBIT growth of 23.47% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
23.47%
Operating income growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 111.32%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
82.80%
Net income growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 339.97%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
69.29%
EPS growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 345.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
69.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 345.45%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
9.26%
Slight or no buybacks while LSX.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
10.00%
Diluted share change of 10.00% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.96%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
7.04%
We show growth while LSX.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.26%
Negative asset growth while LSX.DE invests at 1.40%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
7.85%
Similar to LSX.DE's 8.18%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-13.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.17%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.