PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.38%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.68%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-128.13%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-128.13%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-38.33%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-41.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-41.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.03%
Slight or no buybacks while LSX.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.03%
Diluted share change of 2.03% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.89%
OCF growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 200.36%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
49.45%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x LSX.DE's 37.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.14%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.33%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSX.DE's 101.78%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
17.09%
Positive asset growth while LSX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
44.33%
Positive BV/share change while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
7.51%
Debt growth far above LSX.DE's 0.07%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
We cut SG&A while LSX.DE invests at 1.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.