PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.96%
Positive revenue growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.44%
Positive gross profit growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
141.21%
Positive EBIT growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
133.19%
Positive operating income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
116.53%
Positive net income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
116.41%
Positive EPS growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
116.41%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.50%
Dividend growth of 9.50% while LSX.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-23.68%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-22.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
67.14%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSX.DE's 198.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
31.65%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
1.98%
Positive 3Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSX.DE stands at 352.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
56.28%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-4.30%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-66.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSX.DE is 34.14%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
142.29%
Equity/share CAGR of 142.29% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
105.17%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
71.57%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
5.28%
We show growth while LSX.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.81%
Positive asset growth while LSX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.05%
Positive BV/share change while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.24%
We’re deleveraging while LSX.DE stands at 9.15%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.19%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.