PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.70%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-25.63%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-22.73%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-35.96%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-51.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-51.81%
Negative EPS growth while LSX.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-51.81%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSX.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
600.75%
Dividend growth of 600.75% while LSX.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
16.25%
OCF growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 96.63%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
31.42%
FCF growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 1133.97%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-0.75%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.84%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSX.DE stands at 393.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
136.12%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-73.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSX.DE is 66.56%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
135.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.16%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.12%
Dividend/share CAGR of 28.12% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
30.40%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 30.40% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.87%
Inventory is declining while LSX.DE stands at 11.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.26%
Negative asset growth while LSX.DE invests at 24.31%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.75%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
12.92%
Debt shrinking faster vs. LSX.DE's 121.80%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.48%
We cut SG&A while LSX.DE invests at 45.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.