PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.68%
Positive revenue growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
101.16%
Positive gross profit growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
213.66%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 8.59%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
260.20%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 8.98%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
638.48%
Positive net income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
649.06%
Positive EPS growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
649.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.10%
Dividend growth of 9.10% while LSX.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-42.17%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-51.89%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
109.96%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to LSX.DE's 102.67%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
27.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
27.54%
Positive 3Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.08%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSX.DE's 1029.82%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
456.63%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
138.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
70.24%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 42.74%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
154.51%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 94.13%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
115.97%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
21.45%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.35%
AR growth of 68.35% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
41.98%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSX.DE's 196.71%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
19.93%
Positive asset growth while LSX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.93%
Positive BV/share change while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
19.36%
We have some new debt while LSX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.38%
We expand SG&A while LSX.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.