3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.13%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 69.22%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
23.71%
Gross profit growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 4559.77%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
47.59%
EBIT growth below 50% of LSX.DE's 276.78%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
43.43%
Operating income growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 276.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
51.76%
Net income growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 193.00%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
50.00%
EPS growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 192.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSX.DE's 192.86%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.21%
Dividend reduction while LSX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
208.16%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x LSX.DE's 152.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
221.39%
FCF growth 75-90% of LSX.DE's 289.45%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
77.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 9.01%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.28%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSX.DE's 120.71%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
425.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 143.61%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.37%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
30.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.72%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while LSX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-89.41%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSX.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-7.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while LSX.DE shows 58.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
25.44%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSX.DE's 102.70%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-0.23%
Negative asset growth while LSX.DE invests at 13.64%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
18.02%
BV/share growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 11.31%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-22.60%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.06%
SG&A declining or stable vs. LSX.DE's 13.78%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.