PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
22.54%
Revenue growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 5.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
18.42%
Positive gross profit growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.61%
Positive EBIT growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
11.38%
Positive operating income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
15.82%
Positive net income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.67%
Positive EPS growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
16.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1640.45%
Dividend growth of 1640.45% while LSX.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-60.91%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-62.05%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
209.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 138.50%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
88.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 23.57%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
86.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 34.63%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.10%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while LSX.DE is at 244.79%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
83.73%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 18.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
878.42%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
108.66%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSX.DE's 131.60%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
413.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
242.42%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 98.44%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
142.47%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
50.13%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.99%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 55.99% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
40.31%
Our AR growth while LSX.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
27.84%
Inventory growth well above LSX.DE's 23.22%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
15.32%
Positive asset growth while LSX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
13.67%
BV/share growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 3.15%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
15.98%
We have some new debt while LSX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.03%
SG&A growth well above LSX.DE's 10.21%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.