PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.74%
Negative revenue growth while LSX.DE stands at 26.52%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-30.35%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-41.07%
Negative EBIT growth while LSX.DE is at 8.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-45.04%
Negative operating income growth while LSX.DE is at 9.07%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-49.05%
Negative net income growth while LSX.DE stands at 177.71%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-48.57%
Negative EPS growth while LSX.DE is at 175.94%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-48.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSX.DE is at 175.94%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.77%
Dividend reduction while LSX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
244.19%
OCF growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 156.54%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
302.43%
FCF growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 142.81%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSX.DE's 58.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
67.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSX.DE's 47.87%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.99%
Below 50% of LSX.DE's 270.12%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
112.69%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSX.DE's 144.41%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
590.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 23.65%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 3.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
56.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 1.46%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.62%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while LSX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-33.06%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSX.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-36.31%
Firm’s AR is declining while LSX.DE shows 47.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-7.43%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-8.07%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
6.90%
75-90% of LSX.DE's 8.64%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-18.11%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.58%
We cut SG&A while LSX.DE invests at 37.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.