PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.34%
Positive revenue growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
19.13%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of LSX.DE's 29.14%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
18.97%
Positive EBIT growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-43.64%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-76.36%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-76.78%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-76.78%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1956.17%
Dividend growth of 1956.17% while LSX.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-44.76%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-48.25%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
169.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 18.16%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
63.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSX.DE's 43.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
61.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSX.DE's 55.64%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133.81%
Below 50% of LSX.DE's 1343.28%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
53.96%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
17.86%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-63.95%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSX.DE is 87.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-24.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSX.DE is 67.82%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
255.52%
Positive growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
69.65%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 17.90%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
46.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 4.34%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1156.98%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1156.98% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
44.20%
AR growth well above LSX.DE's 5.11%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-10.77%
Inventory is declining while LSX.DE stands at 85.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.95%
Positive asset growth while LSX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.92%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
18.40%
We have some new debt while LSX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.53%
SG&A growth well above LSX.DE's 7.20%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.