PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.43%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.94%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-22.88%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
80.36%
Positive operating income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
279.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 139.49%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
282.78%
EPS growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 139.47%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
282.78%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 139.47%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.25%
Dividend reduction while LSX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
69.79%
OCF growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 28.49%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
64.06%
FCF growth similar to LSX.DE's 65.32%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 13.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
45.59%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSX.DE's 68.24%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.44%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 43.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
124.88%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
492.66%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 112.66%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 3.21%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
60.86%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 10.47%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.62%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while LSX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-87.88%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSX.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-23.72%
Firm’s AR is declining while LSX.DE shows 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-16.60%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-4.17%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
5.34%
BV/share growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 1.47%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.87%
We’re deleveraging while LSX.DE stands at 5.58%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.21%
We cut SG&A while LSX.DE invests at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.