PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.10%
Positive revenue growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
236.90%
Positive gross profit growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
35.92%
Positive EBIT growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
36.38%
Positive operating income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
36.31%
Positive net income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
37.50%
Positive EPS growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
37.50%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1350.22%
Dividend growth of 1350.22% while LSX.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-24.06%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-17.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 12.88%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
16.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSX.DE's 49.14%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
350.46%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 64.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
195.32%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 9.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
9.39%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.41%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
55.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LSX.DE's 7.54%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.30%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.30% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
61.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 61.06% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
32.36%
Our AR growth while LSX.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.31%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSX.DE's 16.09%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
9.79%
Asset growth at 50-75% of LSX.DE's 13.13%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
5.38%
Positive BV/share change while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
10.11%
Debt shrinking faster vs. LSX.DE's 69.45%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
218.77%
We expand SG&A while LSX.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.