PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.49%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-10.59%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
23.47%
Positive EBIT growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
23.47%
Positive operating income growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
82.80%
Positive net income growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
69.29%
Positive EPS growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
69.29%
Positive diluted EPS growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
9.26%
Share count expansion well above M7U.DE's 3.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
10.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above M7U.DE's 3.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.96%
Firm’s AR is declining while M7U.DE shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
7.04%
We show growth while M7U.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.26%
Negative asset growth while M7U.DE invests at 6.91%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
7.85%
50-75% of M7U.DE's 11.48%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-13.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.17%
We cut SG&A while M7U.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.