PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.38%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.68%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-128.13%
Negative EBIT growth while M7U.DE is at 23.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-128.13%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-38.33%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-41.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-41.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.03%
Slight or no buybacks while M7U.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.03%
Slight or no buyback while M7U.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.89%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x M7U.DE's 42.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
49.45%
FCF growth similar to M7U.DE's 52.26%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.14%
Firm’s AR is declining while M7U.DE shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.33%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. M7U.DE's 22.31%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
17.09%
Asset growth well under 50% of M7U.DE's 51.54%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
44.33%
Positive BV/share change while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
7.51%
We have some new debt while M7U.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
We cut SG&A while M7U.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.