PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.02%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of M7U.DE's 23.85%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
15.57%
Gross profit growth under 50% of M7U.DE's 41.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
251.12%
Positive EBIT growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
251.12%
Operating income growth above 1.5x M7U.DE's 85.66%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
24.37%
Net income growth under 50% of M7U.DE's 169.32%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
20.00%
EPS growth under 50% of M7U.DE's 162.50%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of M7U.DE's 162.50%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
7.82%
Share count expansion well above M7U.DE's 5.45%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
7.82%
Diluted share count expanding well above M7U.DE's 5.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while M7U.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-52.88%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-74.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
64.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of M7U.DE's 115.11%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
64.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x M7U.DE's 49.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
29.67%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to M7U.DE's 32.22%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
226.96%
Similar net income/share CAGR to M7U.DE's 242.90%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
226.96%
Below 50% of M7U.DE's 1150.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
100.21%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of M7U.DE's 162.50%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
109.56%
Equity/share CAGR of 109.56% while M7U.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
109.56%
Below 50% of M7U.DE's 547.04%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
77.45%
Below 50% of M7U.DE's 189.20%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.31%
Our AR growth while M7U.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
9.16%
Inventory growth well above M7U.DE's 14.81%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.04%
Asset growth well under 50% of M7U.DE's 25.89%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.22%
Under 50% of M7U.DE's 16.83%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-12.02%
We’re deleveraging while M7U.DE stands at 492.49%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.69%
SG&A growth of 10.69% while M7U.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.