PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.21%
Positive revenue growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-55.14%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
17.70%
Positive EBIT growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.40%
Positive operating income growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
19.91%
Positive net income growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
18.42%
Positive EPS growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
18.42%
Positive diluted EPS growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.20%
Slight or no buybacks while M7U.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.20%
Slight or no buyback while M7U.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
18.14%
Dividend growth of 18.14% while M7U.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-57.95%
Negative OCF growth while M7U.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-69.63%
Negative FCF growth while M7U.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
65.64%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to M7U.DE's 71.87%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.43%
Below 50% of M7U.DE's 189.86%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.30%
Negative 3Y CAGR while M7U.DE is 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
128.08%
Equity/share CAGR of 128.08% while M7U.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.54%
Below 50% of M7U.DE's 278.43%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.14%
AR growth of 16.14% while M7U.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
25.89%
Inventory growth well above M7U.DE's 0.89%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
25.70%
Asset growth above 1.5x M7U.DE's 16.36%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.10%
We have a declining book value while M7U.DE shows 41.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
91.53%
Debt growth far above M7U.DE's 18.03%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.43%
We cut SG&A while M7U.DE invests at 98.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.