PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.13%
Positive revenue growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
23.71%
Gross profit growth under 50% of M7U.DE's 278.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
47.59%
Positive EBIT growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
43.43%
Positive operating income growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
51.76%
Positive net income growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
50.00%
Positive EPS growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
50.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.21%
Dividend reduction while M7U.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
208.16%
Positive OCF growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
221.39%
Positive FCF growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x M7U.DE's 66.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
77.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x M7U.DE's 38.11%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.28%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x M7U.DE's 50.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.62%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of M7U.DE's 161.67%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
425.62%
Positive short-term CAGR while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.37%
Below 50% of M7U.DE's 459.82%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
30.38%
Below 50% of M7U.DE's 169.25%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.72%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while M7U.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-89.41%
Negative near-term dividend growth while M7U.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-7.73%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
25.44%
Inventory growth well above M7U.DE's 27.37%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.23%
Negative asset growth while M7U.DE invests at 20.54%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
18.02%
Similar to M7U.DE's 18.23%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-22.60%
We’re deleveraging while M7U.DE stands at 21.95%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.06%
We expand SG&A while M7U.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.