PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.34%
Positive revenue growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
19.13%
Positive gross profit growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
18.97%
Positive EBIT growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-43.64%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-76.36%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-76.78%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-76.78%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1956.17%
Dividend growth of 1956.17% while M7U.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-44.76%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-48.25%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
169.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x M7U.DE's 79.30%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
63.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x M7U.DE's 20.00%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
61.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x M7U.DE's 20.04%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133.81%
Positive OCF/share growth while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
53.96%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while M7U.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
17.86%
Below 50% of M7U.DE's 661.68%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-63.95%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-24.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while M7U.DE is 5.72%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
255.52%
Below 50% of M7U.DE's 2743.44%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
69.65%
Below 50% of M7U.DE's 339.45%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
46.73%
Below 50% of M7U.DE's 103.74%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1156.98%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1156.98% while M7U.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
44.20%
AR growth well above M7U.DE's 5.55%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-10.77%
Inventory is declining while M7U.DE stands at 40.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.95%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x M7U.DE's 5.06%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
-2.92%
We have a declining book value while M7U.DE shows 22.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
18.40%
We have some new debt while M7U.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.53%
SG&A growth well above M7U.DE's 42.44%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.