PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.82%
Positive revenue growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
48.93%
Positive gross profit growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-144.66%
Negative operating income growth while MZX.DE is at 12.27%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-375.30%
Negative net income growth while MZX.DE stands at 29.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-100.00%
Negative EPS growth while MZX.DE is at 500.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-100.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE is at 500.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-100.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-100.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.51%
Our AR growth while MZX.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
75.76%
We show growth while MZX.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
61.68%
Positive asset growth while MZX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-100.00%
We have a declining book value while MZX.DE shows 376.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
155.56%
We have some new debt while MZX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.39%
SG&A growth well above MZX.DE's 25.56%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.