PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.01%
Positive revenue growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
28.02%
Positive gross profit growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
569.92%
Positive EBIT growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
569.92%
Positive operating income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
166.51%
Positive net income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-100.00%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MZX.DE stands at 36.54%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MZX.DE is at 120.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MZX.DE is 120.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MZX.DE is 60.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-100.00%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MZX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MZX.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MZX.DE is at 113.59%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.19%
AR growth well above MZX.DE's 1.61%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.17%
We show growth while MZX.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.20%
Asset growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 0.60%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.24%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.76%
SG&A growth well above MZX.DE's 2.60%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.