PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.43%
Positive revenue growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.32%
Positive gross profit growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
229.06%
Positive EBIT growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
229.06%
Positive operating income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
133.80%
Positive net income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.96%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
26.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
26.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MZX.DE's 24.49%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.31%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MZX.DE's 120.09%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
63.31%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MZX.DE's 107.62%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
63.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
18.10%
Equity/share CAGR of 18.10% while MZX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
18.10%
Below 50% of MZX.DE's 455.35%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
18.10%
Below 50% of MZX.DE's 52.16%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.59%
AR growth well above MZX.DE's 2.62%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.91%
Inventory growth well above MZX.DE's 4.22%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.82%
Asset growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 0.44%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.86%
We’re deleveraging while MZX.DE stands at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.97%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.