PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.86%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.84%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-114.18%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-114.18%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-253.35%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-227.81%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-227.81%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
20.00%
Slight or no buybacks while MZX.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
20.00%
Slight or no buyback while MZX.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.90%
Our AR growth while MZX.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
36.00%
We show growth while MZX.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
42.26%
Positive asset growth while MZX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-16.04%
We have a declining book value while MZX.DE shows 323.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
119.20%
We have some new debt while MZX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.25%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MZX.DE's 31.85%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.