PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
46.67%
Positive revenue growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
48.07%
Positive gross profit growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1383.88%
Positive EBIT growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1383.88%
Positive operating income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
202.37%
Positive net income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
211.76%
Positive EPS growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
211.76%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-8.33%
Share reduction while MZX.DE is at 28.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-8.33%
Reduced diluted shares while MZX.DE is at 28.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while MZX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.44%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
64.44%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 19.27%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
64.44%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133.07%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MZX.DE's 107.53%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
133.07%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
133.07%
Positive short-term CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
17.85%
Equity/share CAGR of 17.85% while MZX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
17.85%
Below 50% of MZX.DE's 96.75%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
17.85%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 2.28%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.18%
AR growth well above MZX.DE's 5.62%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.26%
We show growth while MZX.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.63%
Asset growth well under 50% of MZX.DE's 10.06%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
18.30%
Positive BV/share change while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.61%
We’re deleveraging while MZX.DE stands at 21.56%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.56%
We expand SG&A while MZX.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.