PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.49%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-10.59%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
23.47%
Positive EBIT growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
23.47%
Positive operating income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
82.80%
Positive net income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
69.29%
EPS growth under 50% of MZX.DE's 260.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
69.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MZX.DE's 260.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
9.26%
Slight or no buybacks while MZX.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
10.00%
Slight or no buyback while MZX.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.96%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
7.04%
We show growth while MZX.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.26%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
7.85%
Under 50% of MZX.DE's 347.40%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-13.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.17%
We cut SG&A while MZX.DE invests at 5.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.