PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.78%
Positive revenue growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
19.93%
Positive gross profit growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
147.57%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 6.62%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
147.57%
Positive operating income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.06%
Net income growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 2.51%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
21.43%
EPS growth of 21.43% while MZX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
21.43%
Diluted EPS growth of 21.43% while MZX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.68%
Share count expansion well above MZX.DE's 1.25%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while MZX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.89%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
63.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 23.62%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
368.90%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 125.42% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
368.90%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 1.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 41.23% while MZX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
41.23%
Below 50% of MZX.DE's 83.68%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3637.61%
Our AR growth while MZX.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.19%
Inventory growth well above MZX.DE's 0.67%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
4.69%
Positive BV/share change while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-14.64%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.55%
We expand SG&A while MZX.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.