PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.38%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.68%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-128.13%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-128.13%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-38.33%
Negative net income growth while MZX.DE stands at 19.13%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-41.18%
Negative EPS growth while MZX.DE is at 466.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-41.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE is at 466.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
2.03%
Slight or no buybacks while MZX.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.03%
Slight or no buyback while MZX.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.89%
OCF growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 28.51%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
49.45%
FCF growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 2.80%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.14%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.33%
Inventory growth well above MZX.DE's 2.71%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
17.09%
Positive asset growth while MZX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
44.33%
Under 50% of MZX.DE's 385.44%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
7.51%
We have some new debt while MZX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
We cut SG&A while MZX.DE invests at 37.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.