PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.68%
Positive revenue growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
101.16%
Positive gross profit growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
213.66%
Positive EBIT growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
260.20%
Positive operating income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
638.48%
Positive net income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
649.06%
Positive EPS growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
649.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.10%
Dividend growth of 9.10% while MZX.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-42.17%
Negative OCF growth while MZX.DE is at 409.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-51.89%
Negative FCF growth while MZX.DE is at 199.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
109.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 42.67%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
27.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MZX.DE's 19.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
27.54%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 1.87%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.08%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MZX.DE's 1653.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
456.63%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 80.00% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
138.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MZX.DE's 200.00%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
70.24%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 12.50%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
154.51%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MZX.DE's 225.66%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
115.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 65.52%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
21.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 13.59%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.35%
Our AR growth while MZX.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
41.98%
Inventory growth well above MZX.DE's 0.66%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
19.93%
Positive asset growth while MZX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.93%
Positive BV/share change while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
19.36%
We have some new debt while MZX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.38%
SG&A growth well above MZX.DE's 17.98%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.