PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.13%
Positive revenue growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
23.71%
Positive gross profit growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
47.59%
Positive EBIT growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
43.43%
Positive operating income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
51.76%
Positive net income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
50.00%
Positive EPS growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
50.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.21%
Dividend reduction while MZX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
208.16%
OCF growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 114.52%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
221.39%
FCF growth 50-75% of MZX.DE's 378.72%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
77.86%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.28%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
425.62%
Positive short-term CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.37%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
30.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.72%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MZX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-89.41%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MZX.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-7.73%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
25.44%
Inventory growth well above MZX.DE's 0.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.23%
Negative asset growth while MZX.DE invests at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
18.02%
Positive BV/share change while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-22.60%
We’re deleveraging while MZX.DE stands at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.06%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MZX.DE's 29.04%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.