PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
22.54%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 5.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
18.42%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 9.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
3.61%
EBIT growth below 50% of MZX.DE's 22.31%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
11.38%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of MZX.DE's 22.31%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
15.82%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MZX.DE's 21.10%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
16.67%
EPS growth at 50-75% of MZX.DE's 22.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
16.67%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of MZX.DE's 22.73%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1640.45%
Dividend growth of 1640.45% while MZX.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-60.91%
Negative OCF growth while MZX.DE is at 328.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-62.05%
Negative FCF growth while MZX.DE is at 142.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
209.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 69.98%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
88.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 37.50%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
86.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 25.60%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.10%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
83.73%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to MZX.DE's 90.63%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
878.42%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 170.00% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
108.66%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MZX.DE's 166.70%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
413.81%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 200.00%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
242.42%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 156.87%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
142.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 39.85%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
50.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 20.69%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.99%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of MZX.DE's 80.51%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
40.31%
AR growth well above MZX.DE's 10.12%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
27.84%
Inventory growth well above MZX.DE's 9.04%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
15.32%
Asset growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 2.34%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
13.67%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 5.67%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
15.98%
We have some new debt while MZX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.03%
SG&A growth well above MZX.DE's 15.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.