PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-30.35%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-41.07%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-45.04%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-49.05%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-48.57%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-48.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.77%
Dividend reduction while MZX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
244.19%
Positive OCF growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
302.43%
Positive FCF growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
67.06%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.99%
Positive OCF/share growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
112.69%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
590.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 114.76%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.46%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
56.13%
Positive short-term equity growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.62%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MZX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-33.06%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MZX.DE invests at 275.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-36.31%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-7.43%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-8.07%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
6.90%
Positive BV/share change while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-18.11%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.58%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.