PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.34%
Positive revenue growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
19.13%
Positive gross profit growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
18.97%
Positive EBIT growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-43.64%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-76.36%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-76.78%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-76.78%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1956.17%
Dividend growth of 1956.17% while MZX.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-44.76%
Negative OCF growth while MZX.DE is at 145.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-48.25%
Negative FCF growth while MZX.DE is at 96.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
169.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 55.80%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
63.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MZX.DE's 43.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
61.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MZX.DE's 48.51%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133.81%
Below 50% of MZX.DE's 894.74%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
53.96%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
17.86%
Below 50% of MZX.DE's 46.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-63.95%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MZX.DE is 9.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-24.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MZX.DE is 4547.37%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
255.52%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 129.92%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
69.65%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MZX.DE's 54.27%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
46.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 28.26%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1156.98%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 185.46%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
44.20%
AR growth well above MZX.DE's 2.68%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-10.77%
Inventory is declining while MZX.DE stands at 1.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.95%
Positive asset growth while MZX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.92%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
18.40%
We have some new debt while MZX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.53%
We expand SG&A while MZX.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.