PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.43%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.94%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-22.88%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
80.36%
Positive operating income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
279.01%
Positive net income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
282.78%
Positive EPS growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
282.78%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.25%
Dividend reduction while MZX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
69.79%
Positive OCF growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
64.06%
Positive FCF growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
45.59%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.44%
Positive OCF/share growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
124.88%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
492.66%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 184.32%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.95%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
60.86%
Positive short-term equity growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.62%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MZX.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-87.88%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MZX.DE invests at 3460.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-23.72%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-16.60%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-4.17%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
5.34%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 0.41%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.87%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.21%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.