PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.10%
Positive revenue growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
236.90%
Positive gross profit growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
35.92%
Positive EBIT growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
36.38%
Positive operating income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
36.31%
Positive net income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
37.50%
Positive EPS growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
37.50%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1350.22%
Dividend growth of 1350.22% while MZX.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-24.06%
Negative OCF growth while MZX.DE is at 1350.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-17.88%
Negative FCF growth while MZX.DE is at 594.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 19.61%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
16.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MZX.DE's 37.51%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
350.46%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 197.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
195.32%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 76.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.77%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 122.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
9.39%
Below 50% of MZX.DE's 122.22%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 44.85%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
55.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to MZX.DE's 50.96%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.30%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while MZX.DE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
61.06%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while MZX.DE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
32.36%
AR growth well above MZX.DE's 5.98%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.31%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MZX.DE's 1.31%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
9.79%
Asset growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 1.29%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.38%
Positive BV/share change while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
10.11%
We have some new debt while MZX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
218.77%
SG&A growth well above MZX.DE's 0.21%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.