3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.77%
Negative revenue growth while Industrials median is 0.80%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-22.70%
Negative gross profit growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-59.22%
Negative EBIT growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-58.79%
Negative operating income growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-62.10%
Negative net income growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-62.07%
Negative EPS growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-62.07%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.81%
Dividend cuts while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
197.33%
OCF growth of 197.33% while Industrials is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
287.89%
FCF growth of 287.89% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.73%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Industrials median of 11.69%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.49%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 0.64%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 15.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.30%
Dividend reductions while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-17.68%
AR shrinking while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-3.26%
Decreasing inventory while Industrials is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-3.30%
Assets shrink while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
2.91%
BV/share growth of 2.91% while Industrials is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-6.83%
Debt is shrinking while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.14%
SG&A decline while Industrials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.