PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.42%
Revenue decline while E4C.DE shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.28%
Cost reduction while E4C.DE shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.78%
Gross profit decline while E4C.DE shows 4.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.78%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x E4C.DE's 0.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
285.31%
Other expenses growth while E4C.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.74%
Operating expenses growth while E4C.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.50%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
99.51%
Interest expense growth while E4C.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.51%
D&A growth less than half of E4C.DE's 7.58%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-17.71%
EBITDA decline while E4C.DE shows 261.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.11%
EBITDA margin decline while E4C.DE shows 248.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.92%
Operating income decline while E4C.DE shows 1244.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.54%
Operating margin decline while E4C.DE shows 1202.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-272.95%
Other expenses reduction while E4C.DE shows 40.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.12%
Pre-tax income decline while E4C.DE shows 999.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while E4C.DE shows 967.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.92%
Tax expense reduction while E4C.DE shows 659.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-31.08%
Net income decline while E4C.DE shows 1409.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.56%
Net margin decline while E4C.DE shows 1362.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.82%
EPS decline while E4C.DE shows 1433.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.82%
Diluted EPS decline while E4C.DE shows 1333.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.